ext_362777 ([identity profile] pcb.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] claidheamhmor 2011-10-13 12:59 pm (UTC)

Recent medical research in Britain (sorry I can't cite a source other than 'via the BBC') shows that convincing patients that somebody is paying attention (even if it's an actor in a white coat) is beneficial to recovery.
But is it ethical to employ a person with no actual ability to help, even if their presence does? If it's organised by qualified professionals, is that any better? Is there a line between belief in the availability of non-existent help and belief in a different sort of non-existent help? Especially when belief in it helps?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org