Date: Friday, 13 June 2008 10:44 (UTC)
You know, the trouble of reading so many things is actually remembering several years down the line what was read First that comes to mind is the electrical conductivity of gold. I know, it is an old example, but until the advance of technology, electrical conductivity was not something that was considered as part of the property of a mineral (I don't know if it is considered a proper property even now, melancthe would know better). I think my point is that even 10 years down the line the advances of technology will discover a property of a mineral or will look at the chemical composition and would be able to discover something that was not previously possible and that will become an added property or an addition to the write-up of the chemical composition. I am not 100% ready to dismiss minerals as something we can close the book on in terms of studying further.

As for other properties - if people want to believe that wearing a gem will help with an illness just based on the writings of ancient civilizations they can go ahead. To remove a fool's delusion is a Herculean task.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

claidheamhmor: (Default)
claidheamhmor

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22 232425262728
2930     

Tags

Active Entries

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags