Book NOT completed

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 23:59
eve_prime: (Default)
[personal profile] eve_prime
The Origins of Totalitarianism, by Hannah Arendt. This is the book I chose to read for January, from my resolutions, but having reached page 163 (not quite a third of the way through), I’ve decided to stop. Although it’s a major work of political theory, and I’ve read some of it before, I am having too many issues with it this time.

The book is divided into three sections. The first is a history of anti-Semitism in Europe, then we have a discussion of the European style of imperialism, and finally there’s a section on totalitarianism. I got all the way through part one and started part two. My problems are threefold. First, in at least the first section she’s writing for people who have a much greater familiarity with the history of Jewish Europe than I have – I’m not familiar with the different types of emancipation, for example, although it seems obvious now that I’ve heard of it that each country must at some point have decided to give at least some of its Jews some of the same rights as its Christian citizens. Relatedly, Arendt isn’t organizing her thoughts to develop clear arguments. She doesn’t set forth the points she’s trying to make and explain how she gets there, she just wanders around the theme a lot. As a small example, she refers several times to the now relatively obscure “Panama scandal” long before she bothers to explain what that scandal was. The third problem is that she makes lots of assertions without providing supportive evidence. She is obviously highly familiar with her topics, and presumably she does have that evidence. Because we know her as a philosopher as well as a historian and political theorist, I would expect that she would be clear about assertions, arguments, evidence, potential counter-arguments, etc., but it’s all rather muddy.

Anyway, my rule for myself is that I need to read at least 100 pages of my self-assigned book before I can set it aside, and if I do set it aside, I need to choose a new book for the month. I am thus choosing Theodore Roszak’s The Making of a Counter Culture. Maybe I’ll come back to Arendt later.

I could be your girlfriend

Thursday, 8 January 2026 11:13
[syndicated profile] fmylife_feed
Today, I hate that my best friend has a boyfriend, who doesn't even treat her right by the way. I could treat her way better, she's all I've ever dreamed of. Too bad she's straight. Too bad I'm straight. I might be in love with my best friend. FML
By Anonymous

Book completed

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 23:54
eve_prime: (Default)
[personal profile] eve_prime
End Times: Elites, Counter-elites, and the Path of Political Disintegration, by Peter Turchin. In general, I was pleasantly surprised by this book, which reflects the author’s work in the new field of “cliodynamics,” where they the use of complexity science to analyze historical data and identify trends. Turchin’s writing style is congenial, and he’s not out to replace conventional history – since that’s where he gets his data.

His big concern is that the two factors most involved in political instability are happening to us right now, and he’s hoping that their work can tell us what our society needs to fix to avoid serious problems. Those two factors are the “overproduction of elites” – having more people competing for positions of wealth and power than there is space for them, for example by having too many people with advanced degrees – and the “immiseration of the general public,” which is typically associated with big disparities in wealth. Ideally we need to improve the well-being and sense of security of the average American, while making sure that those who are “over-educated” are still reasonably happy. (I’m thinking student loan forgiveness would help with that.) I suspect that there are ways that modern societies may differ from earlier societies that their models may not capture, but it’s still interesting to read about their work.
[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Lana DeGaetano

The perk of being a corporate employee is that sometimes, they'll give you access to a company credit card for you to use within reason. The company expects you to use your discretion to make responsible purchases, and only purchases related to work are covered. Sounds like a good deal to me. Pens are pricey nowadays, and those work lunches add up. If my company is paying for my Chipotle bowl after 6 PM, then I'll probably never leave. That's just me, though.

Unfortunately, having access to the golden company credit card isn't always what it's chalked up to be. Some higher-ups prefer to micromanage your spending because they distrust you, which, in all fairness, isn't abnormal. Surely, many employees wrongfully use company funds for personal reasons, but since we're almost always on the side of the small guy, we'll have to turn a blind eye to those tales…

In the next story you'll read, you'll meet an employee who uses their company credit card to cover dinner meals when they are stuck at the office after hours working overtime. The employee explains that they don't use the card for meals every day, but within reason, they feel that the company should cover these one-off costs when they and their colleagues are expected to work beyond regular working hours. Whether you disagree with employees having access to company cards or not, you have to admit that the company should, at the very least, be covering employee dinners when they are forced to remain in the office. It's only fair.

A newer higher-up wasn't a big fan of this behavior, so he told the employee to use their own card, then write up an expense report so they can be reimbursed instead. Challenge accepted. The employee proceeds to write up expense reports, alright. An individual one. Every time they purchased something. Sent directly to their boss's inbox. Good luck reading all of those reports, Dave. Scroll to read about the fallout, which includes colleagues following in this employee's footsteps en masse.

[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Bar Mor Hazut

Working at a register in any workplace environment can be a stressful experience. Anyone who has had a job standing behind the counter can share moments where the line would just get longer, and customers get more and more impatient, and working through that becomes more and more difficult.

One of the most annoying scenarios that can happen to an employee working the register is a malfunction that they cannot fix. The cash drawer is stuck, the screen is frozen, or the receipt printer ran out of ink. It can be a 30-second fix, but it can also cause an actual holdup that leads to a huge line. And who are the customers going to blame for the issue? The person behind the counter. They don't care what is causing the holdup; they just want to get checked out and go home.

When the library employee in the story below was told that a new policy states that they must give printed receipts to every checkout, they knew this could only lead to a stressful experience like the one described above. Unfortunately, there was not much they could do about it. If management wants them to print everything, that is what they will have to do.

It wasn't long before this new policy led to chaos in the library. One guy checked out 47 items, which forced the employee to print out two full pages of receipts, and by noon, it was clear that the printer was not handling the extra workload very well. When the line in the library got so long that everything was overflowing, the employee knew it wasn't their fault, but it was still an annoying position to be in. They could only hope that the fallout would convince management that their new policy was bad news, and that things were working perfectly fine the way they were before.

They were correct. The same day, the city office got involved to understand why people were complaining about the service in the library, which led management to take back their demands and restore things to the original state.

Sometimes, the best way to show someone how bad their idea is, is by simply following through with it…

What is wrong with you?

Thursday, 8 January 2026 08:40
[syndicated profile] fmylife_feed
Today, I noticed my daughter’s bathroom was dusty, so I screamed at her for keeping the bathroom in unacceptable condition. She had a panic attack and has been crying for the past week. She’s 24. FML
By emerald
[syndicated profile] foxtrotalpha_feed
Costco has earned a lot of good will from drivers for its tire program - here's what they toss in for free when you buy a new set.

Everyone's an expert

Thursday, 8 January 2026 02:04
[syndicated profile] fmylife_feed
Today, and for this past week, I've had multiple people tell me all I needed to do to cure my incredibly rare chronic illnesses was some essential oils. Putting those 'medications' aren’t going to do anything. They then proceeded to give me more advice on how to treat a kidney transplant. FML
By Anonymous
[syndicated profile] snopes_feed

Posted by Laerke Christensen

One trader made more than $400,000 betting on Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro's downfall. But was the anonymous bettor a Trump insider?
[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Etai Eshet

Most high schoolers hand in assignments, some hand over notes from teacher to parent, and then there is the rare genius who hand-delivers an invoice for emotional labor, complete with a logo on top. 

I was a very difficult kid, and I really don't envy my high school teachers, middle school teachers, or elementary school teachers, to be honest. I was always the 'has so much potential' kid who didn't bother coming to class, barely showed up, and could not sit still when actually present. But, and that's a very big but, in my opinion, I was always polite, never bad-mannered, and never ever entitled or condescending. Or at least never entitled enough to treat a teacher like customer support for my own laziness. That is why it takes a very special breed of brat to grow into the student in this story.  

You can feel the customer mindset all over this kid. School as a service. Teacher as employee. Deadlines as suggestions. The work is optional, but the accommodations are not. He ignores reminders, skips checkpoints, and then acts like the grade is a billing error. Suddenly, time spent thinking about maybe doing the project is considered work.

[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Lana DeGaetano

One of the work tales that is as old as time? A new higher-up joins the team, only to overturn and upend the entire working system because they can't comprehend how other companies run if they are following a protocol that is different from theirs. There is an influx of new toxic managers every year, whether that be because they are formerly scorned subordinates or have toxic rule-enforcing virtue. The corporate world fails to penalize and discipline crooked managers and other higher-up roles because the system works against calling them out. Being a manager means not only knowing your industry, but also knowing how to be an effective leader to a group of equals who are likely just as smart as you. The new manager featured in the story below fails to understand this, and this leads to the eventual resignation of a top-performing employee who brought in nearly a quarter million in profit in the last year.

The sales world isn't for the faint of heart. Knowing how to transform a sales schedule and lifestyle into something that works for you is the first step to attaining the work/life balance everyone so seeks. The employee who shares this story explains that they found a system that works for them, which, of course, includes remote work. This is the future, but toxic corporate soldiers with old-school mindsets refuse to wake up and smell the computers. Scroll below to read about how this employee chooses to know their worth instead of taking the heat from their new manager.

Close call

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 23:31
[syndicated profile] fmylife_feed
Today, I slipped on a wet floor in the grocery store. Instead of falling gracefully or quickly, I windmilled my arms for a few seconds while making direct eye contact with a toddler who looked genuinely impressed. I didn’t fall, but still… FML
By Anonymous
[syndicated profile] foxtrotalpha_feed
Van life has become increasingly popular, but the entry price is inaccessible to many. Fortunately, Japanese kei vehicles could provide a cheaper alternative.

[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Remy Millisky

This young worker was taken aback by an older coworker's abrupt rejection of her holiday gift. 

What to do with a gift you don't like? I never worry about this, honestly. If I don't like a gift that someone gave me, like a lotion or a book or even a sweater, I just regift it to someone in a whole separate friend group. That's an okay thing to do, right? If I was already going to buy that person a gift, I may as well regift them something they'll enjoy and will never know the difference. For the same reason, I also don't really mind if people regift things to me. Whatever makes the world go round! There are thrift stores for a reason — just because someone else didn't appreciate something doesn't mean you can't reuse it and enjoy it fully. 

This person basically did that during a workplace gift exchange. Her coworker, who's in an older generation than her, gave her a scarf and a pair of socks, and this younger woman wasn't thrilled with that gift. It's pretty generic, but it is also the kind of thing that most of us can still use (who doesn't need new socks every now and again, am I right?). This young woman accepted the gift graciously, but her coworker rejected her gift. 

Now, here's where it gets interesting. Depending on your perception of this post, which you can read below, you may or may not think that the older woman did anything wrong. It seems like these coworkers already have some beef marinating before this whole debacle, which could certainly tint the way that this whole conversation played out. The older woman didn't care for her lip balm present, but her rejection uses fairly neutral language. If she doesn't like the flavor, it's kind of generous for her to offer up the gift to someone who "will actually use it." Of course, if she had a nasty tone while saying that, or she thrust it into her younger coworker's face, that's a whole different story. The younger woman insists that the coworker has it out for her… but I'm curious if there are just generational or cultural differences that are driving these two apart. After all, when you're young, you haven't met tons and tons of people who are different than you. You might take someone's speaking style or tone in a whole different manner than they intended, just because you're accustomed to people speaking to you in one specific communication style. 

Commenters landed on both sides of the argument. Some called out the younger coworker for being unkind, while others thought that the older coworker was being ridiculous. And some also thought that it was wild to have an employee gift exchange in this economy, which is just totally unnecessary! Keep scrolling to read the full exchange and comments, and see who you side with. 

A murder in Minneapolis

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 21:17
[syndicated profile] pharangula_feed

Posted by PZ Myers

Today, ICE shot a woman in the face. They have an explanation.

In a post to X, the homeland security department (DHS) insisted the person was a “domestic terrorist” who “weaponized her vehicle” and attempted “to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them”.

The department claimed several ICE officers were hurt, but noted that they are expected to make full recoveries.

“An ICE officer, fearing for his life, the lives of his fellow law enforcement and the safety of the public, fired defensive shots. He used his training and saved his own life and that of his fellow officers,” the DHS post said.

That’s their story. But…we have video of the event. Watch closely. Look for an attempt to kill officers, rather than get away. Look for ICE officers being hurt. Explain how someone trying to get away from the scene is threatening the lives of the officers. Tell me what “defensive shots” against an unarmed driver are.

The mayor of Minneapolis, Jacob Frey, had a few words for ICE.

Frey even issued an emphatic statement to ICE directly: “I do have a message for our community for our city and I do have a message for ICE. To ICE, get the fuck out of Minneapolis. We do not want you here. Your stated reason for being in this city is to create some kind of safety and you are doing exactly the opposite. People are being hurt. Families are being ripped apart. Longterm Minneapolis residents that have contributed so greatly to our city, to our culture, to our economy are being terrorized and now, somebody is dead.

Continued to address ICE, Frey said: “That’s on you. It’s also on you to leave. It’s on you to make sure that further damage, further loss of life and injury, is not done.”

The mayor also noted that DHS is “trying to spin this as an action of self defense. Having seen the video myself, I wanna tell everybody directly, that is bullshit.”

Yeah. GET THE FUCK OUT OF MINNEAPOLIS, THE STATE, AND THE ENTIRE GODDAMN COUNTRY.


In further accounts, she was shot in front of her wife as they were trying to record the ICE agents.

Fear factor

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 21:59
[syndicated profile] fmylife_feed
Today, I put my son on a ladder and told him to help me get down the Christmas lights to force him to face his terrible fear of heights. He cried for a good ten minutes, then started to calm himself down, just in time for my wife to run out screaming, "GET HIM OFF THAT LADDER!" Now he's even more scared. FML
By James
[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Ben Weiss

Adulting involves a ton of unexpected curveballs, but having to deal with your roommate's kid stealing your food should not be one of those issues. 

This 26-year-old had only been living with her roommate, a 30-year-old single mother, and her roommate's 6-year-old son for less than a year. The young twenty-something previously had been living with someone else, who seemed to be a closer friend, until that person had to leave. In other words, it sounds like her new roommate was a last-minute replacement and not someone she knew very well beforehand.

At first, there were no major issues. In fact, their work schedules were the complete opposite of one another, so there was not much opportunity for conflict. That all changed when the 26-year-old began to notice that her food was going missing. We're not just talking about the occasional ingredient; we're talking about entire Tupperware containers full of leftovers. 

After monitoring the situation for some time, the author figured out that the leftovers that would go missing would often be the meals she prepared that did not include any vegetables. This became the clue she needed to confirm that her roommate was feeding the author's leftovers to her 6-year-old son, who abhorred vegetables.

So this year, the author decided to combat this problem by eating healthier… and forcing her roommate to find a more appropriate solution for feeding her own kid.

Down with Plato!

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 18:51
[syndicated profile] pharangula_feed

Posted by PZ Myers

I remember when all the radical lefties were complaining that the university curriculum was too packed with tired old white men, which was true–the Western Canon is overstuffed with old guys. But I always thought the idea was to open the door to more diversity, to recognize more worthy women and brown people, and let the curriculum breathe a little more. It was less about culling Greek philosophers and to introduce more Great thinkers of different backgrounds.

Well, leave it to the conservatives to carry the idea to an extreme. Texas A&M wants to ban Plato.

Texas A&M has decided that Plato is not to be taught, a determination that suggests the problem is not ancient philosophy but what happens when people read it.

As Daily Nous reports, the university has instructed a professor not to teach Plato’s work in a “Contemporary Moral Problems” course, an act that is both historically incoherent and politically revealing. Plato is not a contemporary provocateur. He is one of the foundational figures of Western philosophy, taught because his writing invites questioning, disagreement, and analysis. Treating Plato as expendable makes clear that the concern is not ideology, but cognition in the time of Trump.

Madness.

What else bothers me is that the Texas A&M administration is overstepping their bounds. Administrators do not typically have the background to dictate the curriculum in a university department; faculty must have the autonomy to determine the content of their courses.

For example, most of the courses I teach are established topics widely recognized by all universities. I teach cell biology and genetics using standard textbooks, and further, these were courses long approved on my campus, and I’m continuing a curriculum established by my predecessors. If an administrator tried to meddle in the content of those courses, not only would I be pissed off, my colleagues would join me in protesting.

We also have to be prepared to extend our teaching to include new material — does anyone think an administrator is more up to date on current advances in biology than I am? I’ve also introduced entirely new courses, like my eco-devo course, which wasn’t just a whim on my part. I had to show my sources, and document my teaching plan to my department. I had to get approval from my division. I had to write a proposal that was presented to all the faculty of my university. Administrators had to deliver the final stamp of approval, but that’s just a formality — course content is and should be entirely a product of qualified faculty and experts.

I hope Texas A&M faculty are ready to rise up in furious protest at administrators killing Plato in a philosophy course.

[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Remy Millisky

These bosses were pretty sure that they made the right choice when firing their best employees, but that doesn't mean they don't have regrets about it. 

No one is perfect, even when they're trying to a professionals in the workplace. Even the best employee in the world will have a flaw or 2. Maybe that worker is great with coworkers, but their hot temper makes them a risk when they're talking with customers. Maybe the worker is very technically skilled, but has such poor communication skills that their coworkers despise them. And sometimes that worker isn't even necessarily flawed — they just make a huge mistake that ends their career on the spot. 

Whatever the reason may be, these bosses had to fire some of their A-team workers, and they weren't happy to see them go. One manager shared a funny story in which they had to say sayonara to a worker who was caught by a secret shopper. What was he caught doing, you ask? Ah, well, he was digging for gold in his nose, as the secret shopper claimed. The employee ardently refuted that claim — he refused to sign any write-ups about the supposed incident.  Since he wouldn't sign it, he was let go. What would you do in that situation? Would you admit to doing something humiliating that you didn't even do if it meant keeping your job? It's hard to say… but it depends on how much you value your dignity, I suppose. There are always better jobs out there — you just need the right push to start looking. 

One surprising story isn't so funny. One person shared that in 2008, they had to watch as 100 people got laid off on the same day. They described the workplace as a "ghost town" after the HR dude had laid everybody off. Then, in a cruel twist of fate, the very same HR person got fired himself. What a terrible day for all involved! I can't imagine the feeling of firing numerous people in the company that you care about. However, subsequently getting fired might even the playing field a little bit… not that it's any consolation to the HR person himself. 

Keep scrolling below to check out a bunch of intriguing stories from the bosses who were bold enough to tell their tales. 

[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Ben Weiss

No one wants to feel like they are actively being replaced at work. 

This employee figured out that her boss had already made a job posting for her current position without even getting the approval of human resources. Thankfully, the author was already keeping a detailed list of grievances and actions performed by her employer that she could potentially use to her advantage when the time came. Well, that time apparently could not come soon enough.

It's easy for folks in hindsight to inform peers of the need to document absolutely everything suspicious that might occur at work. However, it's hard to know when to start documenting your manager's behavior carefully. In this instance, the author knew after the treatment that two of her coworkers endured that it was only a matter of time before she would become the target of her boss's unfair and unprofessional behavior.

Sure, she never could have expected that it would culminate in her boss looking for a replacement in such an unsubtle manner. Still, despite not anticipating exactly how their conflict would bubble to the surface, she was more than prepared to defend herself.

[Spicy] | Insatiable

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 19:26
[syndicated profile] fmylife_feed
Today, my husband is a normal man in his thirties with a receding hairline and a dad bod. So why am I insanely attracted to him and just want to always have sex with him or do things to him? I can't stop myself. I just turn on when I see him and start sucking his cock. He can't keep up and hates it. FML
By Anonymous
[syndicated profile] pharangula_feed

Posted by PZ Myers

Squint harder, ya dork

If you are anything like me, you are eagerly anticipating the day that either Trump drops dead (preferably slowly, and in agony), or that Congress grows a spine and asserts its constitutional authority to slap the old fart down. The former is probably much more likely. Unfortunately, just seeing Trump hog-tied or buried in a shallow grave on one of his golf courses does not solve our problems — JD Vance is waiting in the wings, and he might be even worse. While Trump is amoral and greedy, Vance has a terrifying ideology driving him. He’s an acolyte of Thiel, and Thiel is an acolyte of Curtis Yarvin.

Curtis Yarvin is almost incomprehensibly popular among rich Silicon Valley libertarian/authoritarians, but I would guess one source of their esteem is Yarvin’s constant sucking up to the wealthy. They should rule the world, he thinks; democracy is bad, and we should let tech parasites be our overlords. Only problem with his perspective is that he’s a moron. Daniel Drezner sums him up.

My considered reaction: at least with the likes of, say, Marc Andreessen, some effort is required to parse out his true-but-not-new points from his new-but-not-true points.1 With Yarvin, it’s much simpler: pretty much everything he says in this interview is wrong. There is no kernel of an interesting idea gone bad; there is just a bunch of half-baked analogies that fall apart if you have a decent liberal-arts education. It’s like listening to a stoned, first-year MBA student who read his father’s outdated history books when he was a teenager and half-remembers them.

I’ve read some of Yarvin’s online work, but not much. It’s self-serving drivel, and anyone with any intelligence will recognize that within a few paragraphs. I think Elizabeth Spiers recognizes the problem.

The most appropriate treatment of Yarvin is one that recognizes his influence on Silicon Valley billionaires who don’t recognize him as a shallow thinker bc they’ve never taken a single class on political philosophy or history or philosophy

So yeah, kids, get a liberal arts education or you might end up as stupidly blinkered as a Yarvin or Andreesen or Thiel or Musk. Maybe my university ought to consider that for a slogan (our current advertising mantra is “More Is Morris,” which is short but not very deep. Don’t worry, they’ll probably change it next year.)

There’s a longer article on Yarvin in the New Yorker, but he’s hardly worth the extensive coverage — my feeling reading anything about him is that anyone pays attention to him. Here’s a short summary of his agenda.

In the spring and summer of 2008, when Donald Trump was still a registered Democrat, an anonymous blogger known as Mencius Moldbug posted a serial manifesto under the heading “An Open Letter to Open-Minded Progressives.” Written with the sneering disaffection of an ex-believer, the hundred-and-twenty-thousand-word letter argued that egalitarianism, far from improving the world, was actually responsible for most of its ills. That his bien-pensant readers thought otherwise, Moldbug contended, was due to the influence of the media and the academy, which worked together, however unwittingly, to perpetuate a left-liberal consensus. To this nefarious alliance he gave the name the Cathedral. Moldbug called for nothing less than its destruction and a total “reboot” of the social order. He proposed “the liquidation of democracy, the Constitution, and the rule of law,” and the eventual transfer of power to a C.E.O.-in-chief (someone like Steve Jobs or Marc Andreessen, he suggested), who would transform the government into “a heavily-armed, ultra-profitable corporation.” This new regime would sell off public schools, destroy universities, abolish the press, and imprison “decivilized populations.” It would also fire civil servants en masse (a policy Moldbug later called RAGE—Retire All Government Employees) and discontinue international relations, including “security guarantees, foreign aid, and mass immigration.”

It wouldn’t be of much concern if Yarvin was just a crank with a blog, but he has become a crank with influence on some very powerful people.

A decade on, with the Trumpian right embracing strongman rule, Yarvin’s links to élites in Silicon Valley and Washington are no longer a secret. In a 2021 appearance on a far-right podcast, Vice-President J. D. Vance, a former employee of one of Thiel’s venture-capital firms, cited Yarvin when suggesting that a future Trump Administration “fire every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people,” and ignore the courts if they objected. Marc Andreessen, one of the heads of Andreessen Horowitz and an informal adviser to the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has started quoting his “good friend” Yarvin about the need for a founder-like figure to take charge of our “out of control” bureaucracy. Andrew Kloster, the new general counsel at the government’s Office of Personnel Management, has said that replacing civil servants with loyalists could help Trump defeat “the Cathedral.”

If Trump were to die, Stephen Miller’s influence might diminish somewhat (a good thing), but he’d be replaced by Curtis Yarvin as advisor, with every Silicon Valley venture capitalist breathing over his shoulder, urging him on to empower mega-capitalism. Yarvin is a scary extremist dude.

As his ideas have been surrealized in DOGE and Trump has taken to self-identifying as a king, one might expect to find Yarvin in an exultant mood. In fact, he has spent the past few months fretting that the moment will go to waste. “If you have a Trump boner right now, enjoy it,” he wrote two days after the election. “It’s as hard as you’ll ever get.” What many see as the most dangerous assault on American democracy in the nation’s history Yarvin dismisses as woefully insufficient—a “vibes coup.” Without a full-blown autocratic takeover, he believes, a backlash is sure to follow. When I spoke to him recently, he quoted the words of Louis de Saint-Just, the French philosopher who championed the Reign of Terror: “He who makes half a revolution digs his own grave.”

How does this bozo get the attention of media and influence so many of the assholes in power? I’ve been doing it wrong. If I want to be rich and popular, I really need to start praising the rich and popular, telling them that they deserve to rule the world.

I’ll try that right now.

Any minute now.

Urk…

Sorry, I just can’t bring myself to be that stupid and craven. Sorry. I’d rather just fade away into obscurity.

[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Bar Mor Hazut

As we all moved from 2025 to 2026 and welcomed the new year, employees all around the world had to endure their yearly performance review of their past year on the job. Usually, this review consists of an hour-long conversation with the boss, where the employee and their boss go through the different tasks, successes, and failures the employee had in the past year. Then, the boss would usually give the employee some sort of grade or ratings, and they would discuss the expectations for the new year and the new challenges ahead.

Some employees are rewarded for a successful year and a positive yearly review, while others endure it for the mere prize of getting to keep a job. It all depends on the workplace, the employee, and, of course, the boss.

In the company in the story below, the general rule is that if your boss rates your performance 'high' or 'outstanding', you get a yearly bonus. One employee had an agreement with their boss that if they took on some of the boss's responsibilities and eased his workload, he would give that employee a high review that would score them the bonus. That agreement worked out for the two of them for the last four years.

This year, however, the boss left and was replaced by a new guy. When the employee explained about the work they've been doing to him, the new boss seemed satisfied with it. But when the employee's yearly performance review rolled around, they were surprised to learn that their new boss rated them as merely 'good', so no bonus for them this year, despite all their hard work.

When the employee confronted the new boss about the poor review, they were told that the boss had higher expectations. This led the employee to decide to drop every single task they were doing so far that wasn't part of their set role. This means dropping every single task they took on to ease on their boss's role.

This week, the new boss will arrive at work and find a lot more tasks on his schedule, including everything that his employee was doing for him so far. In the meantime, the employee will be able to focus on their job and meet their boss's high expectations, and hopefully be entitled to the bonus in 2026…

[syndicated profile] snopes_feed

Posted by Taija PerryCook

Hilton moved to cut ties with the independently owned and operated franchise, according to a spokesperson.
[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Emma Saven

Forrest Gump once said that life is like a box of chocolates: "You never know what you're gonna get." The more I hear that quote, the more I'm convinced he was talking about his neighbors.

Sometimes you luck out with the Friendly Smiths, the kind of people whose house always smells like cookies and who wave when you pull into the driveway. Other times, you end up with the Creepy Toms, who always seem to be standing just a little too still by the window. Unfortunately, we don't get to choose our neighbors, so every move is a 50/50 draw. This particular couple seems to have landed next to their own version of the Creepy Toms, roughly 200 feet away, to be exact. So when the wife receives a politely written letter, heavily seasoned with passive aggression, it's no surprise she's left feeling confused. The letter insists the couple install or use blinds so the neighbor no longer has a "clear" view into their kitchen.

The problem? At 200 feet away, there is no clear view, unless someone is making a very intentional effort to stare into your home. If the neighbor is so frustrated by movement next door, one would think she could simply close her own blinds…or maybe put down the binoculars. The couple disagrees on how to respond. The husband votes for silence and peace, hoping the issue resolves itself. Meanwhile, the wife sits at the kitchen table, plotting her revenge.

[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Remy Millisky

There are few things that can throw a teen into a tizzy faster than the prospect of getting concert tickets to their favorite bands! 

Do you remember your first concert? I certainly do — it was a good old fashioned Jingle Ball show, hosted by a popular radio station, and featuring a bunch of popular radio artists. I went with a few family members and we had an incredible time. The hype around the concert was simply irresistible! There's a buzz in the air as you wait for the openers to come on, browse merch, talk with other concert-goers, and then finally, after all that waiting, get to see your favorite musicians right there in front of your very eyes. 

This parent is pretty hype, too — they're trying to plan an awesome concert for their kiddo. She's 15, and as a Christmas present, they wanted to get her a ticket to see a band they both really love. This would be an excellent bonding experience for the two… except that this parent had a bit of a social faux pas while describing the event to their sister-in-law. 

No one ever said that concert tickets were cheap — these days, they're comically expensive, costing 3 or 4 figures easily. Even if you find tickets that cost $150, if you're going as a pair, the price balloons to $300, plus tax, plus whatever silly venue fee they're going to tack on, plus the price of gas, tolls, parking, or transit, plus the cost of food and/or merch… it can easily cost you hundreds to attend a show, and not everyone has that kind of money to burn. 

This person brought up potentially buying tickets in front of the SIL, and things quickly turned awkward. The parent explained that they simply had more disposable income since their daughter is an only child, but that's not the kind of thing you can say out loud during a conversation, it's just implied. Life's not fair — sometimes you watch your friends get expensive gifts and pricey tickets when you know your own parents can't afford that. That's why it can be so awkward to talk about these things, because neither the parent nor the SIL are really in the wrong here. Still, this person was kind enough to consider getting their niece a ticket anyway, and you can read down below how that went over. They added an update to the original post — check out the full tale below.

RFK Decimates Vaccine Schedule

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 15:49
[syndicated profile] sciencebasedmedicine_feed

Posted by Steven Novella

As anticipated, RFK Jr. continues to be a wrecking ball on the American healthcare scene as HHS secretary. His latest move to undermine vaccines in any way possible is to reduce the number of vaccines on the routine vaccine schedule from covering 17 illnesses to covering only 11. This will have the predictable result of reducing vaccine compliance and increasing preventable disease. […]

The post RFK Decimates Vaccine Schedule first appeared on Science-Based Medicine.
[syndicated profile] snopes_feed

Posted by Emery Winter

On Jan. 3, 2026, the Trump administration launched an overnight operation to capture the Venezuelan president from his home.
[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Emma Saven

How does one differentiate between making the most of present opportunities and idealizing a future that does not exist?

Well, it's written right there, whether you noticed it or not: but the future does not yet exist. So why not focus on something that does? Especially if that very something is only going to benefit you and your future! Well, it makes it more complicated when you have someone beside you, promising you the world and all you've ever dreamed of on the side…But a promise and a written offer are knowingly two different cases. So we'd advise going with the latter. 

This bank worker has been thinking about purchasing her first home for a while and was thrilled when her bank offered her a loan with 2% interest. What a deal, right?! "Wrong!", at least according to her short-term boyfriend, utterly offended by the fact that she wishes to take up the offer, without the consideration that they may want to purchase a home together…(wait for it)..."in the future." Not only are his controlling tendencies beginning to shine through, but it is her responsibility to ensure that she doesn't give up on a smart financial decision that will actually contribute to her future. So what will it be? A short-term man who needs his ego stroked, or a property offer of a lifetime!?

I'm a goober

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 14:52
[syndicated profile] fmylife_feed
Today, I decided to clean my entire apartment. While vacuuming, I sucked up something big. I didn’t realize what it was until later when I couldn’t find my engagement ring. I digged through a vacuum bag full of dust, crumbs, and mystery hair, only to realize it was on my finger the whole time. FML
By Louis
[syndicated profile] foxtrotalpha_feed
The entire autonomy project is doing the same job as a parked cop car except that, here, people nearby can be sure that there's no live cop inside.

Which Automaker Should Make A New City Car?

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 14:25
[syndicated profile] foxtrotalpha_feed
Maybe you want to see a new sort of city car, like a tiny roadster, or you want a company like McLaren to try its hand at building one.

In which I defend AI

Wednesday, 7 January 2026 13:10
[syndicated profile] pharangula_feed

Posted by PZ Myers

Don’t be too shocked, but I think AI does have some utility, despite the occasional hallucination.

A Utah police department’s use of artificial intelligence led to a police report stating — falsely — that an officer had been transformed into a frog.

The Heber City Police Department started using a pair of AI programs, Draft One and Code Four, to automatically generate police reports from body camera footage in December.

A report generated by the Draft One program mistakenly reported that an officer had been turned into a frog.

“The body cam software and the AI report writing software picked up on the movie that was playing in the background, which happened to be ‘The Princess and the Frog,” Sgt. Rick Keel told FOX 13 News. “That’s when we learned the importance of correcting these AI-generated reports.”

We use AI at my university for that purpose, too. Ever sit through a committee meting? Someone has to take notes, edit them, and post them to a repository of meeting minutes. It’s a tedious, boring job. Since COVID moved a lot of those meetings online, we’ve found it useful to have an AI make a summary of the conversation, sparing us some drudgery.

Of course, someone should review the output and clean up the inevitable errors. The Heber City police didn’t do that part. Or maybe they did, and someone found the hallucination so funny that they talked about it.

[syndicated profile] failblog_cheezburger_feed

Posted by Bar Mor Hazut

Who let their dogs out?

Many people dream and aspire to own a nice, private house in a quiet neighborhood, surrounded by kind neighbors and friendly families. It might be a bit cliché, but wanting to experience that serene dream is nothing to be ashamed of. Owning a house, starting a family, and working in a job you enjoy are some of the most basic foundations for a happy life, but they are also great and practical aspirations that might seem tangible for even the most average person.

Imagine you have achieved part of that dream–you bought a picket-fenced house in a nice neighborhood, and you moved there with your loving partner and your sweet dogs. So far, so good, right?

Well, the thing that no one tells you about this dream is how rare it actually is to find a quiet neighborhood with kind neighbors; it might be even more challenging than saving the money to buy the actual house. Neighbors are unpredictable, and you can never know who you might end up living next to for the rest of your 'dream' life. They could be the nicest people in the world, but they could also be the most entitled. The only way to find out is by living right next to them.

When the homeowners in the story below moved into their place, they were prepared to live in their dreams. Here was a wonderful space, with a large fenced yard for their dogs, a place to have friends over, invest in their hobbies, and so on. What they see coming is how their next-door neighbors would complain about every single move they make inside their dream home.

Text after text, these neighbors complained about everything–claiming the homeowners were talking too loudly, playing music, and letting their dogs out into their fenced yard. These neighbors had problems with it all. It almost felt like, even though it was a dream house, these neighbors were not letting anyone actually live there.

At some point, the demands became too much to deal with, and the homeowners decided to stand for their rights and for the freedom to live however they wished. 

Would the neighbors accept that? Keep scrolling to read the full story to find out. After that, check out this story of how a company lost millions by taking away employees' incentives.

Profile

claidheamhmor: (Default)
claidheamhmor

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617 181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Tags

Page Summary

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags