Australia's 1st Rocket Crashes 14 Seconds Into Maiden Flight
Wednesday, 30 July 2025 17:44![[syndicated profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/feed.png)
Property line wars will find you no matter how hard you try to be nonconfrontational and morally sound. Why? Well, not everyone follows the same drama-free lifestyle as you, and principles are as varied as the common cold. Even if you try your best to be the nicest neighbor you can be, someone will try to turn you into the bad guy.
What do you do when someone insists that what you do with your property, on your property, is their problem? Well, first, you have to analyze the situation and ensure you're not unknowingly up to no good. Once you disqualify yourself as the "threat," so to speak, you know that whatever qualm your neighbor has with you is a direct result of something they feel entitled to.
In this next story, an entitled neighbor starts problems with a new homeowner after they put up a privacy fence. The neighbor had been using the new homeowner's backyard before the homeowner purchased the house, and now wants to complain about being "boxed in" their smaller yard. If they wanted more yard space, they should have purchased more land, don't you think? Scroll below to read the entire story.
If you need proof that your boss's policies are a literal dumpster fire, there's nothing more obvious than a literal fire resulting from their policies. That's where this employee found herself when she was wedged firmly between the "rock" of common sense and the "hard place" of following her boss's orders.
When a new supervisor came onto the scene, he fell victim to one of the classic blunders of managing a new team: rigid policy rife with authoritarianism, leaving workers with little room to think for themselves and put their actual experience to good use. Where there's smoke, there's fire, and depending on your given workplace, that might be more literal than it is metaphorical. In this case, it was more in the literal sense. When the warehouse worker was told to follow orders and not to touch things "unless it's your job," after reporting that one of the machines in the warehouse was smoking, she listed and just focused purely on the tasks she had been assigned. But when the machine went up in flames, production came to a standstill, with the previous policy that led to the issue being swept under the rug with the ashes.
There is no shortage of situations like this in workplaces worldwide. What's your workplace's most ridiculous policy that backfired?
Getting back at bad customers never felt so good.
When you're an employee, especially in a retail or food service setting, you don't have much power to stand up to your customers. You basically just have to take whatever they throw at you. No matter what the customer says, no matter how snarky or impolite they become, you're expected to just stand there and endure it. There aren't many other jobs in the world that allow people to be so impolite — if you act that way in a corporate setting, for example, you'll probably get reprimanded or maybe even fired.
Customers know that they can boss around retail employees, so they'll happily do so. They just won't take no for an answer on some questions, and eventually they have to pull out their ultimatum: "Let me speak to the manager!"
In some exceptional cases, though, that employee already was talking to the manager. What a sweet, sweet revenge it is for that manager to watch their crabbiest customer wilt into submission upon finding out they've bossed around the exact wrong person.
Next up, read about the employees who were just baffled by their coworkers, like one person who shared that on "Day 1… she refused to shake my hand."
Do you ever find yourself saying random stuff and then catching yourself, thinking, 'Oh my god, I am turning into my mother'?
You might come home from work one day, for example, and see that the dishes are not washed, and there are shoes scattered around the house, and everything is a mess. So you turn to your partner, who was home the entire day, and say, 'I am the only one who does anything in this house'. Then, it hits you–you just uttered the words you used to hear come out of your mom every single day, and there is no turning back.
The thing is, after you accept the fact that you are more like your mom than you expected, you realize that moms are usually not wrong. Wanting the house to be clean and pleasant to live in is actually a decent expectation, and what they asked of us as teens wasn't that much of a big deal as we made it out to be.
Why is it so hard to wash the dishes as soon as you finish eating? What difference does it make if you put your shoes where they belong instead of discarding them in the middle of the living room?
Good news for us atheists — we can now deny god publicly in the classroom!
Civil servants can seek to “persuade others of the correctness of their own religious views,” the Office of Personnel Management said in the memorandum to federal agencies, adding employees must ensure their efforts are “not harassing in nature.” OPM issued the guidance to restore constitutional freedoms and enable feds to practice their religious practices without fear of retaliation, the agency said.
“Federal employees should never have to choose between their faith and their career,” OPM Director Scott Kupor said. “This guidance ensures the federal workplace is not just compliant with the law but welcoming to Americans of all faiths.”
I know, if you’re a “glass half-empty” kind of person, you might think this is another step in the erosion of secularism and the separation of church and state, but I’m an optimistic “glass half-full” kind of guy. I’ve always been careful to not introduce my anti-religious sentiments in the classroom, or to make dismissive comments about gods to my colleagues, and when students tell me about their religious holidays, I make accommodations for them. But no more! I don’t have to conceal my fervent secular beliefs any more!
I get to be the kind of stereotypical atheist asshole portrayed in the God’s Not Dead movies. First day of class, the lecture is on why Jesus is stupid. First exam will have a question, “50 points: God exists, true or false” and the only answer I’ll accept is “false!” Religious students will be told they fail the class unless they can prove the existence of their god in a public debate in the classroom. Creationists in my evolution class? Not on my watch, they aren’t.
It’ll be such a relief to not have to throttle myself anymore.
I wonder if it will be a distraction from the scientific subject matter of my courses to bring up contentious issues like that? Nah. If probing the private, personal beliefs of their coworkers is considered a protected behavior in the federal government, why shouldn’t I poke deeply into these wacky ideas that some people at the university hold? It’s only fair.
Anyone want to take bets on whether the author(s) of that memorandum were atheists, or even considered the existence of atheist employees?
Have you ever been so tired during a workday that you ended up wishing your boss would just come up to you and say, 'Hey, you seem off, why don't you take the rest of the day off?'
It probably never happened to any employee ever, but one can dream, right? We can dream about a scenario in which a boss is observant and kind, and knows when their employees have reached their limit. However, we all know that the reality is that if a boss tells you to go home out of the blue, it is probably not because they are worried about you, but quite the opposite.
Kindly or unkindly, if one's boss ends up actually telling them to go home mid-day, how is an employee expected to react? Should they insist on staying, or should they simply accept their fate?
If the story below is any indication, when a boss, especially a horrible boss like Marco, tells you to hang your apron and go home for the rest of the shift, maybe you should listen to them. Perhaps Marco is giving you a clear sign that it's time to stop putting up with him, which is exactly what the employees in the story below did.
Buckle up and keep scrolling to read the full tale.
Everyone wants to know what their bosses think of them behind closed doors. You want to know if they're as happy with your work as they seem to be, if they're planning on fulfilling their promise of giving you that raise any time soon, or if they're even thinking about your well-being within the business. Unfortunately for this employee, he ended up overhearing a conversation with his boss and another employee that illuminated a significant pay discrepancy.
There had been an open position for several months at this company while the author of this story was sharing extra tasks and responsibilities with their manager. They already suspected that another employee below them on the "food chain" was getting paid the same amount as them at the very least, but had made peace with that reality given how much of a hard worker this other employee was. However, when that open position was filled, the person joining the business under the author was making, as it turns out, significantly more than the author's salary.
Carlos G found some C++ that caused him psychic harm, and wanted to know how it ended up that way. So he combed through the history. Let's retrace the path with him.
Here was the original code:
void parseExpiryDate (const char* expiryDate)
{
// expiryDate is in "YYMM" format
int year, month;
sscanf(expiryDate, "%2d%2d", &year, &month);
//...
}
This code takes a string containing an expiry date, and parses it out. The sscanf
function is given a format string describing two, two digit integers, and it stores those values into the year and month variables.
But oops! The expiry date is actually in a MMYY
format. How on earth could we possibly fix this? It can't be as simple as just swapping the year
and month
variables in the sscanf
call, can it? (It is.) No, it couldn't be that easy. (It is.) I can't imagine how we would solve this problem. (Just swap them!)
void parseExpiryDate(const char* expiryDate)
{
// expiryDate is in "YYMM" format but, in some part of the code, it is formatted to "MMYY"
int year, month;
char correctFormat[5];
correctFormat[0] = expiryDate[2];
correctFormat[1] = expiryDate[3];
correctFormat[2] = expiryDate[0];
correctFormat[3] = expiryDate[1];
correctFormat[4] = '\0';
sscanf(correctFormat, "%2d%2d", &year, &month);
//...
}
There we go! That was easy! We just go, character by character, and shift the order around and copy it to a new string, so that we format it in YYMM
.
The comment here is a wonderful attempt at CYA. By the time this function is called, the input is in MMYY
, so that's the relevant piece of information to have in the comment. But the developer really truly believed that YYMM
was the original input, and thus shifts blame for the original version of this function to "some part of the code" which is shifting the format around on them, thus justifying… this trainwreck.
Carlos replaced it with:
void parseExpiryDate (const char* expiryDate)
{
// expiryDate is in "MMYY" format
int month, year;
sscanf(expiryDate, "%2d%2d", &month, &year);
//...
}
The exact role of different types of dietary fat and the best approach to prevention in cardiovascular disease has been somewhat controversial. However, the level of controversy among experts is much less than that being generated in the public by outliers and contrarians. Since cardiovascular disease remains a major source of morbidity and mortality, it’s important for the public to be kept […]
The post Review Recommends High Dose Statins first appeared on Science-Based Medicine.This or any DORK TOWER strip is now available as a signed, high-quality print, from just $25! CLICK HERE to find out more!
HEY! Want to help keep DORK TOWER going? Then consider joining the DORK TOWER Patreon and ENLIST IN THE ARMY OF DORKNESS TODAY! (We have COOKIES!) (And SWAG!) (And GRATITUDE!)
“Who’s winning on the internet, the attackers or the defenders?”
I’m asked this all the time, and I can only ever give a qualitative hand-wavy answer. But Jason Healey and Tarang Jain’s latest Lawfare piece has amassed data.
The essay provides the first framework for metrics about how we are all doing collectively—and not just how an individual network is doing. Healey wrote to me in email:
The work rests on three key insights: (1) defenders need a framework (based in threat, vulnerability, and consequence) to categorize the flood of potentially relevant security metrics; (2) trends are what matter, not specifics; and (3) to start, we should avoid getting bogged down in collecting data and just use what’s already being reported by amazing teams at Verizon, Cyentia, Mandiant, IBM, FBI, and so many others.
The surprising conclusion: there’s a long way to go, but we’re doing better than we think. There are substantial improvements across threat operations, threat ecosystem and organizations, and software vulnerabilities. Unfortunately, we’re still not seeing increases in consequence. And since cost imposition is leading to a survival-of-the-fittest contest, we’re stuck with perhaps fewer but fiercer predators.
And this is just the start. From the report:
Our project is proceeding in three phases—the initial framework presented here is only phase one. In phase two, the goal is to create a more complete catalog of indicators across threat, vulnerability, and consequence; encourage cybersecurity companies (and others with data) to report defensibility-relevant statistics in time-series, mapped to the catalog; and drive improved analysis and reporting.
This is really good, and important, work.
The summer heat makes us do questionable things… But would you ever jump into some stranger's pool without asking them first? Probably not, and that's because you are not a crazily entitled person who thinks the world exists to serve them and them only.
I live in NYC, so a private pool is alien to me. The closest I get to a cold dip in the pool is a cold shower in the early morning when my building's hot water hasn't kicked in yet. However, I feel like I'd know how to act in the case that I lived in a cute cul-de-sac with a reputation for in-ground pools. The protocol? Make friends with the neighbors and watch everything fall into place.
The neighbors in this next story couldn't bother befriending the new homeowner who purchased an elderly woman's home. It's important to note that this elderly woman allowed the neighbors in this story, along with their children, to swim in her pool whenever they wanted. It is equally important to note that this new homeowner never gave the neighbors the green light to swim in their pool. Scroll below to read the whole story.
Arriving home from a dreary work day, you're greeted with the sounds of laughter of children splashing around in your pool. A brilliant and floating sound that fills the late-afternoon summer air. You smile to yourself. This is why you insisted on finding a house with a pool when you and your wife were looking for a new place for your growing family. As you unlock the front door and set your bag down, you can't help but notice how dark and quiet things are inside. Something isn't quite right, and it dawns on you: Your wife and kids aren't home, they're out for the afternoon. So who the heck is in your backyard?
Safe to say almost anyone would be a little confused by this situation. Most of us wouldn't just presume to use our neighbor's property without at least asking for permission first. The audacity on display here is unparalleled: Absolute assumption of ownership over something that didn't belong to them on the property of someone who was essentially a complete stranger.
Favoritism in the workplace… ahhhh what an interesting topic.
Hear us out, there are always going to be favorites, that is unfortunately, just how the world works. A person is a person, regardless of whether they are the janitor or the CEO, so it is human nature to naturally gravitate towards some people more than others. But should this favoritism interfere with professionalism in the workplace? Well, that answer is simple. No.
If someone is acting on their feelings of admiration in the workplace, they are putting the company's success at risk. Just because they may find someone compatible with their own interests does not always mean that that person is the best employee for the job. So, how does one go about ensuring they are treated equally in the workplace? Do they expose favoritism when it's in their eyeline and holding them back, or do they simply sit there quietly and get the job done?
Read more to find out how this fed-up employee chose to deal with feeling like he was invisible in the workplace, by gaining no attention or guidance from his supervisor, as it was all stockpiled for his coworker.
And who said corporate wasn't a good idea?!?
Every now and then, you stumble across an employee who you just know is trying their hardest to get fired. Like, if you're a receptionist who picks up the phone by picking it up then slamming it back down to end the call, you're not exactly looking for a promotion. And other people have never met a deadline they couldn't miss. Then there are the people who literally clock in, stare at a blank Word document for 8 hours, then clock out, baffling everyone around them. You're doing worse than the bare minimum, and you're just daring management to put you on a PIP or fire you outright. Still, somehow these daring workers will keep their jobs for years after they stop caring about it… which can make things pretty strange for everyone else who has to pick up the slack.
No one knows this better than HR professionals. In this line of work, you have to be very cautious about hiring and firing, and you're privy to tons of employee information, sometimes even camera footage of the workspace. Before anyone else in the workplace knows, human resources is aware of in-office spats, who's taking long-term leave, and which teams are getting eliminated.
Check out a bunch of stories from HR workers detailing their strangest days on the job. Next, see how you'd react if you were the GF who got dumped after her BF failed her Instagram "test": 'I'm apparently supposed to treat her Instagram like a job interview.'
Fashion should be an extension of one's personality. There shouldn't be a right or wrong way to develop your own style, but let's face it: there definitely is. Whether it's some items of clothing that simply do not go together or an impractical fashion decision like wearing uncomfortable high heels in the wrong environment, there are inevitably missteps when it comes to what you choose to wear outside.
One of the most amusing parts about living in a city like New York is when you actually take a moment to observe what other folks have chosen to wear, because if you do that, you are bound to see something bizarre. There are lots of oddballs and strange choices here, and while I personally am not adventurous with my fashion, I cannot help but look up to those who are daring and bold. Even if it doesn't work in the end, you can't fault them for trying.
Keep scrolling below for this collection of equally amusing fashion mishaps and malfunctions!
Some people just won't listen to common sense. If you work in any kind of retail job, work with annoying clients, or even just have a boss who can't answer their emails on time, you know this is a fact. Even when it benefits them, some folks just have a hangup about listening to authority figures. Like someone might tell them, "Hey, you can't park here." And instead of asking why, or asking where else they could park instead, their immediate instinct is to glare at that worker and insist that uh, yes, actually, they will be parking here.
Now, a lot of workers in that situation would try their best to convince the person not to park somewhere they aren't allowed. The employee might not be able to do their job properly otherwise. But these workers decided to let a cranky Karen make her own choices, and she swiftly regretted it, as you can read about in the story down below.
Next, read about some employees whose coworkers are driving them batty: "He doesn't have a clue what he's doing."