Metrication at NASA, and T. Rex Bones
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 11:01Metric:
Here's an interesting article on the lack of metrication at NASA:
NASA criticised for sticking to imperial units
The whole issue of Metrication in the United States is pretty interesting; I wasn't aware the US used such a mish-mash of systems. The one that surprises me is the construction industry: managing conversions between different Imperial units and handling of areas and volumes must be nightmarish compared to metric.
Here's a map from Wikipedia showing the countries not using the metric system (they're in red):
Scientific Controversies:
And on an unrelated note, quite an interesting article on the collagen found in a fossilised Tyrannosaurus Rex femur, and the controversies it engendered:
Origin of Species: How a T. Rex Femur Sparked a Scientific Smackdown
Here's an interesting article on the lack of metrication at NASA:
NASA criticised for sticking to imperial units
The whole issue of Metrication in the United States is pretty interesting; I wasn't aware the US used such a mish-mash of systems. The one that surprises me is the construction industry: managing conversions between different Imperial units and handling of areas and volumes must be nightmarish compared to metric.
Here's a map from Wikipedia showing the countries not using the metric system (they're in red):
Scientific Controversies:
And on an unrelated note, quite an interesting article on the collagen found in a fossilised Tyrannosaurus Rex femur, and the controversies it engendered:
Origin of Species: How a T. Rex Femur Sparked a Scientific Smackdown
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 11:15 (UTC)I do think the Federal government uses it, as I have an architect friend who has done work for them and talked about it.
edg
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 14:19 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 11:25 (UTC)I don't believe metric use is officially mandated here in any way but that in some places it is officially encouraged, whatever that means.
I think also that the "it's easier" argument has kind of gone by the wayside since unfortunately I'd be willing to bet that most people in the US do not understand the decimal system at all.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 14:23 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 14:25 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 14:35 (UTC)I don't envy those who have to measure construction materials in Imperial though; my dad, who worked as an estimator in the construction industry, worked in Imperial units for a while when South Africa switched to metric, and he told me it was quite a hassle going from areas to volumes in feet and inches (concrete volumes, for example).
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 14:37 (UTC)I do like using feet and inches to measure a person's height. It would be boring as F to reach "one meter" and know you were never going to get to "two meters" even, whereas you can get far more milestones using feet! :)
For example, Len is now more than two feet taller than he was when he was born.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 15:02 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 11:46 (UTC)Anyway it never really bothered me until I began taking physics in college, all of a sudden the metric system not only made sense it was relevant!
Don't see it happening here though, not yet.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 14:24 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 15:13 (UTC)I’m always dumbfounded by that discussion.
In Engineering the comment was, “ Well our customers want English units.”.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 12:02 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 14:29 (UTC)Because of that, I can easily think in common Imperial units like feet, inches, pounds and miles. Others, like furlongs, rods, hundredweights, ounces, and stones stymie me though.
I can convert Fahrenheit to Celsius in my head, but I don't really have a feel for Fahrenheit, apart from knowing that 32F is cold and 100F is fuckin' hot.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 14:40 (UTC)32F is cool. Cold is -20F. BFC is -40F (which is the same in degrees C, too)
100F is pretty damn hot (though that also depends on humidity; I'd rather be in a dry desert 100 degrees than an Albany NY 85-90 degrees.). The range in temperature here (Albany/Troy New York) over a year is from roughly -20/25 up to +100F, or in Celsius from about -30 to +38C.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 15:08 (UTC)On the downside, because the climate is so temperate, we're not geared for temperature extremes. No central heating, no decently insulated homes, and not many homes with any sort of air conditioning. So when things get cold, we wear extra clothes, use more blankets, haul out the gas/electric heaters, and shiver a lot.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 16:28 (UTC)If it CAN get to freezing, I'd insist on a real heating system. And if it CAN get to the 90s, I'd insist on an air conditioner. Just because I *CAN* endure the extremes doesn't mean I *want* to, and as a modern technological being I don't think I should have to.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 25 June 2009 18:55 (UTC)F to C: Take away thirty, and half of that.
C to F: Double C and add 30.
Another neat trick when converting MPH to KPH in your head, for a quick estimate, is take half of the kilometers and ad everything in the original number minus the last digit.
For example:
300,000 kilometers
Half of it is 150,000
Add everything except the last digit
150,000 + 30,000 = 180,000 Miles.
This is easy for me to remember as it's the speed of light.
C = 186,000 MPS or 300,000 KPS
no subject
Date: Thursday, 25 June 2009 19:25 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 25 June 2009 19:28 (UTC)Oh. And as for Canada? I can buy a gallon on milk, a pound of nails, carpet by the yard and a car that has good mileage.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2009 12:52 (UTC)I have gotten used to the Imperial system in books, but having grown up with the metric system, it is easier for me to imagine 7meters down vs calculating 21 feet.